Re: default partitions can be partitioned and have default partitions?
| От | Amit Langote |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: default partitions can be partitioned and have default partitions? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+HiwqG6j=Vh_r-HCeO_EQQCnoESWqk7mCaXh1U0wCg5OFVFQw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | default partitions can be partitioned and have default partitions? (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 12:18 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote: > postgres=# CREATE TABLE t(i int)PARTITION BY RANGE(i); > CREATE TABLE > postgres=# CREATE TABLE t0 PARTITION OF t DEFAULT PARTITION BY RANGE(i); > CREATE TABLE > postgres=# CREATE TABLE t00 PARTITION OF t0 DEFAULT; -- oh yes > CREATE TABLE Actually, you can go even further CREATE TABLE t00 PARTITION OF t0 DEFAULT PARTITION BY HASH (i); > Not sure how it could be useful to partition default into subpartitions of > lists, ranges, hashes. Yeah, maybe the top-level partitioning should be designed such that the default partition doesn't need sub-partitioning, but perhaps Postgres shouldn't prevent users from trying it. This was discussed when the default partition feature went in; see [1]. Thanks, Amit [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoYh-hitRRUfxVxDVAjioYPrjhBCehePGRUa6qNNUnKvuw%40mail.gmail.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: