Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Langote
Тема Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions
Дата
Msg-id CA+HiwqEoL6fipwbOD9UouYEFUguG9kvxd+u6vkXSKjC9r+0zwA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions  (Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 3:39 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 12:10 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 04:13:04PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> > > Patch 0002 needed a rebase, because a conflicting change to
> > > expected/rules.out has since been committed.
> >
> > The cfbot reports new conflicts since about a week ago with this patch:
> > Could you send a rebased patch?  In the meantime I'll switch the cf entry to
> > Waiting on Author.
>
> Turns out I had never compiled this patch set to exercise xml and lz4
> tests, whose output files contained view definitions shown using \d
> that also needed to be updated in the 0002 patch.
>
> Fixed in the attached updated version.

cfbot tells me it found a conflict when applying v7 on the latest
HEAD.  Fixed in the attached v8.

-- 
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)
Следующее
От: Daniel Gustafsson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New developer papercut - Makefile references INSTALL