Re: Clarification on the docs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Igor Korot
Тема Re: Clarification on the docs
Дата
Msg-id CA+FnnTyyUV-QwkSYbXoXmmoc+ghhEsmeEvjQ1QH6uFZVzvwR9A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Clarification on the docs  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Clarification on the docs
Список pgsql-general
Hi, David,

On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 9:04 PM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 6:49 PM Igor Korot <ikorot01@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, ALL,
On the https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/sql-createindex.html#SQL-CREATEINDEX-STORAGE-PARAMETERS
its said:

[quote]
The optional WITH clause specifies storage parameters for the index.
Each index method has its own set of allowed storage parameters. The
B-tree, hash, GiST and SP-GiST index methods all accept this
parameter:
[/quote]


These are the index methods and the valid lists for each.  The docs are correct in how they remove duplication.  I'm undecided on whether that is the best presentation choice.  I would at minimum place a new paragraph after "own set of allowed storage parameters." so that "The B-tree, hash..." begins its own line.

B-tree:
fillfactor
deduplicate_items

Hash:
fillfactor

Gist:
fillfactor
buffering

SP-Gist:
fillfactor

GIN:
fastupdate
gin_pending_list_limit

BRIN:
pages_per_range
autosummarize

This above looks much better. What stops you from pushing it?

There is no double meaning and everything is split nicely.

Thank you.


David J.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: