Re: Remove unused fields from BufferCacheNumaRec
| От | Chao Li |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Remove unused fields from BufferCacheNumaRec |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | C7FFA493-6CFD-49D1-89F6-D5FB13AF02D6@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Remove unused fields from BufferCacheNumaRec (Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Remove unused fields from BufferCacheNumaRec
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Nov 21, 2025, at 19:34, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi hackers, > > While working on [1], I noticed that there are unused fields in BufferCacheNumaRec > since ba2a3c2302f. > > Also, I noticed that a comment was not at the correct location in > pg_buffercache_numa_pages(). > > The attached takes care of both. As long as compile passes, that proves the removal of the unused fields is safe. And by reading the code, I believe the movementof the comment is also correct. Looks like you have done a little bit rewording on the comment: 1. "This loop stores into os_page_ptrs[]” is understandable, but feels a bit incomplete to me as non-English-speaking. Iunderstand your intention is to make “stores” and “touches” to share “addresses”. But this is not a strong opinion comment,if Michael considers okay, I will be fine as well. 2. Instead of saying “if needed”, why don’t explicitly mention something like “on the first pass”. Best regards, -- Chao Li (Evan) HighGo Software Co., Ltd. https://www.highgo.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: