Re: logical replication of truncate command with trigger causes Assert
| От | Mark Dilger |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: logical replication of truncate command with trigger causes Assert |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | C6BE98EB-158D-4130-9E1C-C3DCFAE0A023@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: logical replication of truncate command with trigger causes Assert (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: logical replication of truncate command with trigger causes Assert
Re: logical replication of truncate command with trigger causes Assert |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Jun 9, 2021, at 7:52 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Here's a draft patch for that. I decided the most sensible way to
> organize this is to pair the existing ensure_transaction() subroutine
> with a cleanup subroutine. Rather unimaginatively, perhaps, I renamed
> it to begin_transaction_step and named the cleanup end_transaction_step.
> (Better ideas welcome.)
Thanks! The regression test I posted earlier passes with this patch applied.
> Somewhat unrelated, but ... am I reading the code correctly that
> apply_handle_stream_start and related routines are using Asserts
> to check that the remote sent stream-control messages in the correct
> order? That seems many degrees short of acceptable.
Even if you weren't reading that correctly, this bit:
xid = pq_getmsgint(s, 4);
Assert(TransactionIdIsValid(xid));
simply asserts that the sending server didn't send an invalid subtransaction id.
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: