Re: Schema version management

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Glaesemann
Тема Re: Schema version management
Дата
Msg-id C569B64F-1D6F-4966-83A1-CD5DC4ECBAD1@seespotcode.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Schema version management  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: Schema version management  (Vik Reykja <vikreykja@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:21, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> No they are not necessarily one logical unit. You could have a bunch of
> functions called, say, "equal" which have pretty much nothing to do with
> each other, since they refer to different types.
>
> +1 from me for putting one function definition per file.

+1. It might make sense to include some sort of argument type information. The function signature is
really its identifier. The function name is only part of it.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Schema version management
Следующее
От: Vik Reykja
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Schema version management