-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, November 17, 2006 05:35:26 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake"
<jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>
>> Since those having @postgresql.org accounts shoudl be limited to these two
>> lists, can anyone comment on a) is this a bad idea? and b) would they be
>> affected because they don't use SMTP AUTH and c) why aren't you using SMTP
>> AUTH? ...
>>
>>
> Are you saying that you don't *require* smtp auth?
We require SMTP AUTH for anyone wishing to relay through any of our servers,
yes ... we don't run open relays *shiver*
My question above was directed towards ppl like JoshB, whom I know are on the
road and sending email, as to whether they are doing SMTP AUTH against
mail.postgresql.org, or using some other means ...
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFFXb7I4QvfyHIvDvMRAvljAJ93fEGBUN3XmNBCzWDC+2wL9PgGNACeKnqX
annXVuu33RZFHG6l/lDXhkA=
=m82Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----