Re: psql - improve test coverage from 41% to 88%

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Daniel Gustafsson
Тема Re: psql - improve test coverage from 41% to 88%
Дата
Msg-id C3473A67-8957-4463-BBF4-92E1F8AE64C0@yesql.se
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: psql - improve test coverage from 41% to 88%  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Ответы Re: psql - improve test coverage from 41% to 88%  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: psql - improve test coverage from 41% to 88%  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> On 1 Aug 2020, at 09:06, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>>>> This patch no longer applies: http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_27_2262.log
>>>>
>>>> CF entry has been updated to Waiting on Author.
>>>
>>> This patch hasn't been updated and still doesn't apply, do you intend to rebase
>>> it during this commitfest or should we move it to returned with feedback?  It
>>> can always be re-opened at a later date.
>>
>> As the thread has stalled, I've marked this Returned with Feedback.
>
> Hmmm.
>
> AFAICR the feedback is that the Expect perl module is not welcome, which seems to suggest that it would have to be
re-implementedsomehow. This is not my dev philosophy, I won't do that, so I'm sorry to say that psql coverage will
remainpretty abysmal. 

Re-reading this thread, I see no complaints about introducing a dependency on
Expect.  The feedback returned in this case is that the patch hasn't applied
since March, and that the patch is more than welcome to be re-entered in the
next CF once it does.

cheers ./daniel


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Btree BackwardScan race condition on Standby during VACUUM
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Rethinking opclass member checks and dependency strength