Re: Call for objections: merge Resdom with TargetEntry

--On Dienstag, April 05, 2005 16:19:54 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 
wrote:

> I've gotten a bee in my bonnet again about Resdom being wasteful.
> There is no case where Resdom appears without TargetEntry, nor vice
> versa, so we ought to fold them into a single node type.  Is anyone
> out there working on a patch that would be seriously affected by
> such a change?  If so speak up --- this could certainly wait till
> after you merge.
>

The viewupdate patch would clearly be affected by this. However, i don't 
think this is something too hard to change in our current patch, as long as 
all fields are kept and keep their functionality.

[...]




-- 
 Bernd