> On Aug 23, 2018, at 12:43 AM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>
> On 2018/08/23 13:09, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>>> On Aug 22, 2018, at 9:12 PM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>>> Below is a copy of the press release draft:
>>>
>>> About the following:
>>>
>>> "PostgreSQL 11 also supports partitioned tables that utilize the
>>> PostgreSQL foreign data wrapper,
>>> [postgres_fdw](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/postgres-fdw.html
<https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/postgres-fdw.html>),
>>> enabling users to combine partitioning with data federation techniques."
>>>
>>> Just to clarify, we support partitioned tables containing partitions that
>>> utilize FDWs even in PostgreSQL 10 [1]. Although, they were not handled
>>> by tuple routing, so offered limited functionality as partitions.
>>> PostgreSQL 11 fixed that limitation, which makes them more useful.
>>
>> Thanks for the clarification! Would something like “PostgreSQL 11 _provides better
>> support for_…” work better?
>
> Maybe, "PostgreSQL 11 enhances the foreign partition functionality offered
> via its PostgreSQL foreign data wrapper [postgres_fdw] …"?
Thanks for the suggestion. I pushed some changes taking ideas from the
above.
Jonathan