On 07/06/2014 10:11 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> Right. I thought about this for a while, and I think we should change
> two things. For one, don't request replies here. It's simply not needed,
> as this isn't dealing with timeouts. For another don't just check ->flush
> < sentPtr but also && ->write < sentPtr. The reason we're sending these
> feedback messages is to inform the 'logical standby' that there's been
> WAL activity which it can't see because they don't correspond to
> anything that's logically decoded (e.g. vacuum stuff).
> Would that suit your needs?
>
> Greetings,
Yes I think that will work for me.
I tested with the attached patch that I think does what you describe
and it seems okay.
> Andres Freund
>