Re: Workaround: Planner preference for tsquery filter vs. GIN index in fast text search

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Laurence Parry
Тема
Re: Workaround: Planner preference for tsquery filter vs. GIN index in fast text search
Дата
Msg-id
BLU178-DS9720D392424599507271CA55F0@phx.gbl
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Workaround: Planner preference for tsquery filter vs. GIN index in fast text search "Laurence Parry" <greenreaper@hotmail.com>
Re: Workaround: Planner preference for tsquery filter vs. GIN index in fast text search Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>
Re: Workaround: Planner preference for tsquery filter vs. GIN index in fast text search Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>
Re: Workaround: Planner preference for tsquery filter vs. GIN index in fast text search Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Workaround: Planner preference for tsquery filter vs. GIN index in fast text search Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>
Re: Workaround: Planner preference for tsquery filter vs. GIN index in fast text search "Laurence Parry" <greenreaper@hotmail.com>
> btw, 9.4 should be wiser in case of rare+common terms,
> thanks to GIN fast scan feature.

I'll look forward to it! We have a few other GIN indexes . . .

I don't want to misrepresent my impression of Postgres performance; the only 
other case where I've made a significant improvement by tweaking was 
pre-checking a couple of tables with count(*) > 0 before using them against 
several thousand submissions (checking lists of blocked artists and keywords 
against submission details). I've been pleasantly surprised at what it can 
handle, especially after index-only scans came out.

-- 
Laurence "GreenReaper" Parry 


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
От: Oleg Bartunov
Дата:
От: Steve Atkins
Дата:
FAQ