Re: Workaround: Planner preference for tsquery filter vs. GIN index in fast text search
От
Laurence Parry
Тема
Re: Workaround: Planner preference for tsquery filter vs. GIN index in fast text search
Дата
Msg-id
BLU178-DS9720D392424599507271CA55F0@phx.gbl
Ответ на
Re: Workaround: Planner preference for tsquery filter vs.
GIN index in fast text search (Oleg Bartunov)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Workaround: Planner preference for tsquery filter vs. GIN index in fast text search "Laurence Parry" <greenreaper@hotmail.com>
Re: Workaround: Planner preference for tsquery filter vs.
GIN index in fast text search Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>
Re: Workaround: Planner preference for tsquery filter vs.
GIN index in fast text search Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>
Re: Workaround: Planner preference for tsquery filter vs. GIN index in fast text search Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Workaround: Planner preference for tsquery filter vs.
GIN index in fast text search Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>
Re: Workaround: Planner preference for tsquery filter vs. GIN index in fast text search "Laurence Parry" <greenreaper@hotmail.com>
> btw, 9.4 should be wiser in case of rare+common terms, > thanks to GIN fast scan feature. I'll look forward to it! We have a few other GIN indexes . . . I don't want to misrepresent my impression of Postgres performance; the only other case where I've made a significant improvement by tweaking was pre-checking a couple of tables with count(*) > 0 before using them against several thousand submissions (checking lists of blocked artists and keywords against submission details). I've been pleasantly surprised at what it can handle, especially after index-only scans came out. -- Laurence "GreenReaper" Parry
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
От: Oleg Bartunov
Дата: