On 06/27/2013 05:04 AM, Szymon Guz wrote:
> On 27 June 2013 05:21, Steve Singer <steve@ssinger.info
> <mailto:steve@ssinger.info>> wrote:
>
> On 06/26/2013 04:47 PM, Szymon Guz wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Steve,
> thanks for the changes.
>
> You're idea about common code for decimal and cdecimal is good,
> however not good enough. I like the idea of common code for decimal
> and cdecimal. But we need class name, not the value.
>
> I've changed the code from str(x) to x.__class__.__name__ so the
> function prints class name (which is Decimal for both packages), not
> the value. We need to have the class name check. The value is returned
> by the function and is a couple of lines lower in the file.
>
> patch is attached.
>
I think the value is more important than the name, I want to the tests
to make sure that the conversion is actually converting properly. With
your method of getting the class name without the module we can have both.
The attached patch should print the value and the class name but not the
module name.
Steve
> thanks,
> Szymon
>
>
>
>
>
>