Re: PL/java

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Martin Gainty
Тема Re: PL/java
Дата
Msg-id BLAPR19MB4227746DC4A48B47D2CB09DDAECE0@BLAPR19MB4227.namprd19.prod.outlook.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PL/java  (Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: PL/java
Re: PL/java
Список pgsql-general
Nota Bene: 
Almost all official interfaces to/from Oracle are coded in Java
FWIK google's implementations are 95% python
(although you would need to understand JSON formatting for import/export requirements)
for those reasons i tread lightly before disparaging either language

Going Forward:
try to implement PL/SQL that rob/joshua mentioned 
if you're calling no-joy after implementing PL/SQL
then we can take a look at interfacing to Postgres ETL binaries with a JNI interface
provided the JNI is spot on with signatures for each referenced function

Un Saludo
m


From: Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 11:16 AM
To: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PL/java
 

On 12/7/20 8:25 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 12/7/20 7:18 AM, Hemil Ruparel wrote:
>> I want to say this. I never liked any extension language. It's like
>> Java is not meant to interact with databases.
>
> The JDBC folks might disagree.
>
That interaction is strictly sql to db, data to app.  As it should be.


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Deferrable FK not behaving as expected.
Следующее
От: Rob Sargent
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PL/java