On 07 April 2014 12:20, Craig Ringer
>
> > Syntax to create autonomous transaction can be as:
> >
> > */PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS TRANSACTION;/*
>
> Wouldn't you want to use SET TRANSACTION for this?
>
> Or a suffix on BEGIN, like BEGIN AUTONOMOUS TRANSACTION ?
>
> What's the logic behind introducing "PRAGMA" ?
>
>
> If you wanted to use that syntax for Oracle compatibility you'd need to
> use:
>
> PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
>
> (note underscore). But really, this would no be a pragma at all,
> PostgreSQL doesn't really have the concept. Calling it that would just
> be misleading.
Actually it is same as oracle (i.e. PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION), it was just typo mistake in previous mail.
But if this is also not accepted then we can discuss and come out with a syntax based on everyone agreement.
>
> > *_Starting of Autonomous Transaction:_*
> >
> > Starting of autonomous transaction will be exactly same as starting
> > sub-transaction.
>
> If you don't want it to dirty read data from the parent tx, or inherit
> parent locks, then it cannot be the same at all.
While starting sub-transaction, it is just initializing the resources required and
links the same to the parent transaction, which we require for autonomous transaction also.
I am not able to notice any issue as you mentioned above with this.
Please let me know if I am missing something or misunderstood your concern.
> > 2. Freeing of all resource and popping of previous transaction
> > happens in the same way as sub-transaction.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean here.
It means, during commit of autonomous transaction, freeing of all resource are done in the same way as done for
sub-transaction.
Also current autonomous transaction gets popped out and points to the parent transaction in the similar way as done for
sub-transaction.
> Overall, this looks like a HUGE job to make work well. I know some
> others have been doing work along the same lines, so hopefully you'll
> be able to collaborate and share ideas.
Yes it is huge works, so I have proposed in the beginning of 9.5 so that we can have multiple round of discussion and
henceaddress
all concerns.
Also I have proposed to finish this feature in multiple rounds i.e. first patch, we can try to support autonomous
transactionfrom
standalone SQL-command only, which will set-up infrastructure for future work in this area.
Using the WIP patch sent, I have done basic testing and it works fine.
Any comments?
Thanks and Regards,
Kumar Rajeev Rastogi