Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)
| От | Dustin Sallings |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | BDA431A7-7E97-11D8-9C78-000393CFE6B8@spy.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite) (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mar 25, 2004, at 5:05, Jan Wieck wrote: > The difference here is that instead of submitting a patch for review, > which is then frozen, the branch owner can (and that means some will, > no matter what your intentions are) keep modifying the branch during > the review process, other than just keeping it in sync with > conflicting changes to the trunk. How do you plan to prevent that? You do both. Changesets are immutable. A patch cannot be modified. However, new patches can be added for tracking changes to the tree. You can review the original diff, and you can review how it's tracked head-of-line changes independently. You can take the original diff and manually wedge it in if you want, or you can see how the latest progress differs before submission. -- Dustin Sallings
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: