Re: Patch: Add parse_type Function

On Mar 20, 2024, at 17:23, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Pushed with some editorialization.  Mostly, I whacked the
> documentation around pretty heavily: we have a convention for what
> examples in function descriptions should look like, and this wasn't
> it.  Not entirely your fault, since some nearby entries in that
> table hadn't gotten the word either.

Ah, great, and your wording on the parser error issue is much better, thank you!

Best,

David