On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> wrote:
> That's interesting. An earlier replication system we had at Afilias
> (erserver, which was descended from the rserv code that used to be in
> contrib/) used this strategy.[1]
>
Oh... I remember erserver. It served us well for about 2 years for a
simple, not very high-velocity database that was 99.44% read-only. I
did have to monitor it closely and restart regularly. At least with
slony I don't worry about it crashing out from under me... :)