On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 19:10, Joe Abbate <jma@freedomcircle.com> wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 12:41 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> The point is that the community seems to have reached a consensus
>> that they would rather use this URL for the above message:
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20031205173035.GA16741@wolff.to
>
> OK, as I said, I can still capture the message-id's by crawling -bugs by
> year-month.
Just to be clear, crawling the current archives for this info is
probably the easiest part of the whole project. In fact, the majority
of the information you'd need is *already* in a postgresql database on
search.postgresql.org.
So - let's start in the other end, and get back to this if/when it's needed.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/