On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 14:51, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 04/12/2011 08:23 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 22:16, Peter Eisentraut<peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> On tor, 2011-04-07 at 16:20 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It sure would be nice if someone would write a doc patch, or at least
>>>> a wiki page, explaining all the permutations here... I get the
>>>> impression it's not that hard to set up if you are reasonable
>>>> comfortable working in a Windows environment, but it's pretty
>>>> intimidating if you aren't.
>>>
>>> Here's a patch I came up with that matches my experience, but evidently
>>> there could be many others.
>>
>> Have we shown for sure that you can't build it with the compiler
>> that's in the SDK? If not, I still think that should be our primary
>> option - I certainly don't see how it's obsolete. (and you can,
>> afaics, still get the platform sdk with the correct version of the
>> compiler (non-vs2010), but I haven't tested it)
>>
>> Or did I miss something in this thread?
>>
>
>
> I haven't actually tried using the SDK alone. I'll try testing that on a
> cloud appliance when I get a chance, as I'm out of Windows boxes I can
Yeah, I'm in the same situation on that, which is why I haven't tested
anythning (yet) myself.
> reasonable perturb. I do know you *need* the SDK for 64 bit builds with VSE
> 2008, as it doesn't include a 64 bit compiler.
That alone seems reason enough to recommend the SDK build method over
VSE, so we don't have to recommend different methods depending.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/