On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> 1. Given a bug number, find the pgsql-bugs emails that mention it in
>> the subject line. Note that the archives would actually MOSTLY do
>> this ,but for the stupid month-boundary problem which we seem unable
>> to fix despite having some of the finest engineers in the world.
>
> Many, many, many bug issues are not associated with a bug report
> submitted through the web interface. People mail stuff to pgsql-bugs
> manually, or issues turn up in threads on other lists. If a tracker
> can only find things submitted through the web interface, that is not
> going to lead to everyone filing bugs that way; it's going to lead to
> the tracker being ignored as useless.
>
>> 2. Associate some kind of status like "OPEN", "FIXED", "NOTABUG",
>> "WONTFIX", etc. with each such bug via web interface.
>
> Anything that even pretends to be a bug tracker will do that. The
> real question is, who is going to keep it up to date? GSM has the
> right point of view here: we need at least a couple of people who
> are willing to invest substantial amounts of time, or it's not going
> to go anywhere. Seeing that we can barely manage to keep the mailing
> list moderator positions staffed, I'm not hopeful.
The issues that you raise are real ones, but doing nothing isn't
better. Right now we have no organized tracking of ANY bugs, and if
someone were hypothetically willing to help with that they would have
nowhere to start. This is a big enough problem that we should at
least TRY to get our arms around it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company