2011/4/5 Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>> On tis, 2011-04-05 at 15:05 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>>> > On tis, 2011-04-05 at 11:21 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>>> >> +1 on using $foo. Even with the standardization risk I think it's the
>>> >> best choice. Prefer $"foo" to ${foo} though.
>>> >
>>> > What standardization risk? The standard has already existed for >10
>>> > years and is widely implemented.
>>>
>>> What is the standard, and who is it that has implemented it that way?
>>
>> As mentioned earlier, see under clause on <identifier chain>. The
>> summary is that in
>>
>> CREATE FUNCTION foo(a int)
>>
>> you can refer to the parameter as either of
>>
>> a
>> foo.a
>>
>> with some scoping rules to resolve ambiguities with column references.
>> (These are essentially the same scoping rules that tell you what "a"
>> refers to when you have multiple tables with an "a" column in a query.)
>>
>> As far as I can tell, the syntax is implemented, more or less, at least
>> in Oracle, DB2, MySQL, Firebird, and HSQL. I haven't checked what they
>> do with the scoping rules, of course.
>
> Talking about the standards compliance of functions is a bit silly:
> our implementation of functions isn't even close to approximating what
> looks to be the standard (according to this at least:
> http://farrago.sourceforge.net/design/UserDefinedTypesAndRoutines.html)
> and there is no point pretending that it is. In practice, database
> functions and procedures are 100% vendor incompatible with each other,
> and with the standard. I was just talking about $ getting reserved
> for some special meaning in the future.
>
> mysql supports psm, which we don't.
A PSM support for PostgreSQL is almost done. I expect a production
quality for 9.2.
MySQL support own language based on PSM with lot of inspiration in T-SQL.
In MySQL - local variables are clasic, only session variables has a prefix @.
Regards
Pavel
oracle supports pl/sql, which is
> similar to pl/pgsql, but means nothing in terms of postgresql sql
> language argument disambiguation afaict. It's our language and we
> should be able to extend it.
>
> merlin
>