Re: Replication references
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication references |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTim0Ow75kKw2LXMcW7eREe=DtDYASQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replication references (Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin.dizdarevic@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Certainly works for me, so something is wrong for you. Did you rebuild? Could be a dependency miss o rsomething.. //magnus On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 21:25, Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin.dizdarevic@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I thought it should be "Slony Replication" in the tree, but the latest > master-build show's: "Replication"? > Am I doing wrong, or is this wanted? > > > 2011/6/26 Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> >> >> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 19:52, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> > On Sunday, June 26, 2011, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 19:10, Guillaume Lelarge >> >> <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 11:41 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 00:07, Guillaume Lelarge >> >>>> <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >> >>>> > On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 18:10 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >>>> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 18:03, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> >> >>>> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Magnus Hagander >> >>>> >> > <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> >>>> >> >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 23:45, Peter Geoghegan >> >>>> >> >> <peter@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>> On 20 June 2011 21:40, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> >> >>>> >> >>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Hi! >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I know we've had some discussions around what to do with the >> >>>> >> >>>> Slony >> >>>> >> >>>> support.. But it's there now, and IIRC the deal was we keep >> >>>> >> >>>> it. >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> That was the deal. FWIW, I consider our Slony support to be >> >>>> >> >>> less than >> >>>> >> >>> useless, in that it is basically a GUI analogue to writing a >> >>>> >> >>> long >> >>>> >> >>> Slonik script full of apparently redundant entries. >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I would, however, suggest that we rename it to actually be >> >>>> >> >>>> "slony >> >>>> >> >>>> replication" rather than "replication". Or "Use slony" rather >> >>>> >> >>>> than >> >>>> >> >>>> "Use replication". Calling it "replication" without >> >>>> >> >>>> qualifying it >> >>>> >> >>>> causes confusion to many users (came across it with a client >> >>>> >> >>>> just >> >>>> >> >>>> today, and it's not the first time). >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I realize we're fairly close to release - is this doable for >> >>>> >> >>>> 1.14, or >> >>>> >> >>>> will that fsck things up for translators? >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> +1 >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> It isn't that hard to translate a few strings into all >> >>>> >> >>> supported >> >>>> >> >>> languages. If a translator isn't available to translate those >> >>>> >> >>> few >> >>>> >> >>> strings (and they'd have to not be answering any e-mail for >> >>>> >> >>> that to be >> >>>> >> >>> the case, and it will take them less than 5 minutes), that's >> >>>> >> >>> likely to >> >>>> >> >>> be in a language that isn't so widely spoken - it certainly >> >>>> >> >>> won't be >> >>>> >> >>> French or German. I'd be willing to live with a poor machine >> >>>> >> >>> translation for a little while for those languages. If someone >> >>>> >> >>> complains, the complaint is likely to be all we need to fix >> >>>> >> >>> the >> >>>> >> >>> problem ourselves. >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> So, something like this. I went with calling the field inthe >> >>>> >> >> dialogs >> >>>> >> >> "Use Slony" rather than "Use Slony replication", simply because >> >>>> >> >> the >> >>>> >> >> second option is very long - much much longer than anything >> >>>> >> >> else >> >>>> >> >> there, leading to a lot of wasted space. >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> Comments? >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > It should be "Slony Replication" for the menu and the collection >> >>>> >> > factory name, not "Slony replication". Otherwise it seems OK. >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> Agreed. Actually I thought I had fixed that already :D >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> > I would like to hear from Guillaume before breaking the >> >>>> >> > translations though. >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> Yeah, I was planning to wait for his comment before committing >> >>>> >> anything. >> >>>> >> >> >>>> > >> >>>> > No problem with me. We have no updates to the translation yet, so >> >>>> > that's >> >>>> > not an issue. >> >>>> >> >>>> Ok, applied. >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> I wasn't planning to - do we really want to change the name of a node >> >> in a minor release? >> > >> > No, but weren't you trying to get it into 1.14? >> >> Oh. Crap. Yes. >> >> I need to pay more attention :O >> >> >> -- >> Magnus Hagander >> Me: http://www.hagander.net/ >> Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ >> >> -- >> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) >> To make changes to your subscription: >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers > > -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления:
Предыдущее
От: Guillaume LelargeДата:
Сообщение: Re: Copy/Paste table(s) functions - git context patch
Следующее
От: Guillaume LelargeДата:
Сообщение: pgAdmin III commit: Handle the server include directory