Re: Transaction control overhauling

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Daniele Varrazzo
Тема Re: Transaction control overhauling
Дата
Msg-id BANLkTim-hk7gCVBB5-sF0mwK74a+++Pf+w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Transaction control overhauling  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Список psycopg
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:

>> II. add a method conn.set_transaction(isolation_level=None,
>> read_only=None, deferrable=None) allowing to change one or more of the
>> transaction settings. Calling the method would terminate the current
>> transaction and put the new settings in place. Note that there are
>> several ways for implementing this:
>
> Ugh. Big -1 on the "terminate current transaction". First of all, I
> *assume* you mean ROLLBACK and not COMMIT. But even so, I think it's a
> much better idea to raise a local exception when trying to change it
> while inside a transaction.

Yes, the idea was to issue a rollback. This is the current behaviour
of set_isolation_level(). No problem in having an exception raised
instead: it seems actually a better defined behaviour.

-- Daniele

В списке psycopg по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Federico Di Gregorio
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Transaction control overhauling
Следующее
От: Federico Di Gregorio
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Transaction control overhauling