Re: XPATH evaluation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Nicolas Barbier
Тема Re: XPATH evaluation
Дата
Msg-id BANLkTikMmW6Ef71jtooVQJWGDXtbVnmM0w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: XPATH evaluation  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
2011/6/17, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>:

> On 06/17/2011 11:29 AM, Nicolas Barbier wrote:
>
>> CDATA sections are just syntactic sugar (a form of escaping):
>
> Yeah. OTOH doesn't an empty CDATA section force a child element, where a
> pure empty element does not?

Wow, some Googling around shows that there is much confusion about
this. I thought that it was obvious that adding <![CDATA[]]> shouldn't
change the content at all, but quite a few people seem to disagree
:-/.

Nicolas

--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Florian Pflug
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY
Следующее
От: Garick Hamlin
Дата:
Сообщение: 9.1beta2 / UNLOGGED + CHECK + INHERITS