Re: DOMAINs and CASTs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jaime Casanova
Тема Re: DOMAINs and CASTs
Дата
Msg-id BANLkTik46G=KRKgdVYru+VxZaViC0cZacQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: DOMAINs and CASTs  (Darren Duncan <darren@darrenduncan.net>)
Ответы Re: DOMAINs and CASTs
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Darren Duncan <darren@darrenduncan.net> wrote:
>
>  ('1800-01-01 00:00:00'::timestamp)::int
>
> Now, since all values of a DOMAIN are also values of the base type the
> DOMAIN is defined as being a subset of, then the sub-expression within the
> parenthesis denotes a value that is both a timestamp and a datetime at the
> same time.
>
> So, if a generic "CAST(timestamp as int)" is already defined, and you define
> a "CAST(datetime as int)", then what should the above code (correct for
> misspelling) do, or should it fail?
>

Obviously it should run the cast from timestamp to int, why it will
run a cast from a domain?
the other way should be allowed, though... a cast from datetime to int
should first look for cast function using the domain and if it don't
find it then with base type

--
Jaime Casanova         www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Darren Duncan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: DOMAINs and CASTs
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Reducing overhead of frequent table locks