Re: pg_upgrade and PGPORT

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: pg_upgrade and PGPORT
Дата
Msg-id BANLkTi=hTHUV7MP+Rx57-ta9X9Sqh_gFPw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_upgrade and PGPORT  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: pg_upgrade and PGPORT
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On ons, 2011-05-11 at 18:36 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Robert Haas wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> > > Or you could just "unsetenv" instead of complaining.
>> >
>> > +1 for that.
>>
>> OK, the attached patch does this, but allows PGCLIENTENCODING to be
>> passed in.  The new output looks like:
>>
>>       Performing Consistency Checks
>>       -----------------------------
>>       ignoring libpq environment variable PGPORT
>
> I haven't tried it, but I suppose option.c will now make use of PGPORT
> and then later you get that message that it was ignored?

Either way, it hardly seems necessary to emit a log message stating
that you are unsetting an environment variable.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Albe Laurenz"
Дата:
Сообщение: Uninitialized SSL values? (was: Fix for bug in ldapServiceLookup in libpq)
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Infinity bsearch crash on Windows