On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com> wrote:
>> you are creating as you iterate through. This behavior was
>> unnecessary in terms of what libpqtypes and friends needed and may (as
>> Tom suggested) come back to bite us at some point. As it turns out,
>> PQsetvalue's operation on results that weren't created via
>> PQmakeEmptyResult was totally busted because of the bug, so we have a
>> unique opportunity to tinker with libpq here: you could argue that you
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Exactly at this moment I am thinking about using modifiable
>> (via PQsetvalue) PGresult instead of std::map in my C++ library
>> for store parameters for binding to executing command.
>> I am already designed how to implement it, and I supposed that
>> PQsetvalue is intended to work with any PGresult and not only
>> with those which has been created via PQmakeEmptyResult...
>> So, I am absolutely sure, that PQsetvalue should works with
>> any PGresult.
>
> All PGresults are created via PQmakeEmptyPGresult, including libpqtypes.
> Actually, libpqtypes calls PQcopyResult which calls PQmakeEmptyPGresult.
>
> It might be better to say a "server" result vs. a "client" result.
> Currently, PQsetvalue is broken when provided a "server" generated result.
er, right-- the divergence was in how the tuples were getting added --
thanks for the clarification. essentially your attached patch fixes
that divergence.
merlin