Re: question about readonly instances

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Szymon Guz
Тема Re: question about readonly instances
Дата
Msg-id BANLkTi=N6rGocexLTFpApXp+poxjYKuMZQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: question about readonly instances  (Ireneusz Pluta <ipluta@wp.pl>)
Ответы Re: question about readonly instances
Re: question about readonly instances
Re: question about readonly instances
Список pgsql-general


On 18 May 2011 22:22, Ireneusz Pluta <ipluta@wp.pl> wrote:
W dniu 2011-05-18 13:21, Szymon Guz pisze:

Hi,
I've got a question about quite a strange configuration.
I was asked if we can have one storage, with one data directory where one postgresql instance writes data, and many other instances read those.
Is that possible without any replication and copying data?

Why do they think they need that?

They've got some quite nice and huge storage and it would be nice to use it from many different machines running postgreses.
Another option is Oracle which can do that. Replicating data to another directory is not an option, not for this amount of data and the way of loading/using data they need.
I've always done that using replication to different machines and running there Postgres on each, I've never heard of this kind of using Postgres. That's why I think this is "strange".

regards
Szymon

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ireneusz Pluta
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: question about readonly instances
Следующее
От: Bret Stern
Дата:
Сообщение: Using libpq with Visual Studio 2008