On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> On 05/04/2011 01:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> The main idea is to be able to store column values in an audit table
>>> like this:
>>> old_value variant
>>> new_value variant
>>> Currently, they use text for old_value and new_value, but this is, of
>>> course, not very satisfactory.
>>
>> Just out of curiosity, what actual functionality gain would ensue over
>> just using text? It seems like doing anything useful with the audit
>> table contents would still require casting the column to text, or the
>> moral equivalent of that.
>>
>
> Yeah, I've been down this road once or twice, and I think that's the $64
> question.
>
> I wrote a custom audit app two or three years ago. After several iterations
> the customer and I found that using an hstore for the old/new (or old record
> / changeset, which is what we actually use) was the most suitable for our
> use.
yeah -- +1 on that method. I think it's really the right way to go
with the recent hstore enhancements.
merlin