Re: collateral benefits of a crash-safe visibility map
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: collateral benefits of a crash-safe visibility map |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | BANLkTi=1b3Cw_GREU1ROau39BO-3nWC7+w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: collateral benefits of a crash-safe visibility map (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: collateral benefits of a crash-safe visibility map
Re: collateral benefits of a crash-safe visibility map |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Hmmm, do we really need to WAL log freezing? > > Can we break down freezing into a 2 stage process, so that we can have > first stage as a lossy operation and a second stage that is WAL > logged? That might solve the relfrozenxid problem - set the bits in the heap, sync the heap, then update relfrozenxid once the heap is guaranteed safely on disk - but it again seems problematic for Hot Standby. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: