Re: parallelizing the archiver

On 10/25/21, 1:29 PM, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 3:45 PM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn@amazon.com> wrote:
>> Alright, here is an attempt at that.  With this revision, archive
>> libraries are preloaded (and _PG_init() is called), and the archiver
>> is responsible for calling _PG_archive_module_init() to get the
>> callbacks.  I've also removed the GUC check hooks as previously
>> discussed.
>
> I would need to spend more time on this to have a detailed opinion on
> all of it, but I agree that part looks better this way.

Great.  Unless I see additional feedback on the basic design shortly,
I'll give the documentation updates a try.

Nathan