Re: Intermittent pg_ctl failures on Windows

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Жарков Роман
Тема Re: Intermittent pg_ctl failures on Windows
Дата
Msg-id B9F855CF-1756-40FA-B9AF-1F48A9480269@postgrespro.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Intermittent pg_ctl failures on Windows  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: Intermittent pg_ctl failures on Windows  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I have tested clean REL_11_STABLE.
Commit f02259fe was reverted by df8b5f3e in this branch.
So pg_ctl uses “old” open() function.

regards, Roman

> 18 июля 2019 г., в 15:51, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> написал(а):
>
>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 09:54:16PM +0700, r.zharkov@postgrespro.ru wrote:
>> You are right. I tested branch REL_11_STABLE and it is my mistake.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> The probability is very small. In one of our tests pg_ctl fails with that
>> error sometime.
>> In a test with multiple frequent restarts the probability is 5-6%. On other
>> machines probability differs.
>> To find out the real error code we used the Process Monitor utility.
>
> I would like to be sure of something here.  Are those failures based
> on what you have tested on REL_11_STABLE or do you still see pg_ctl
> complain about such things on HEAD (post f02259fe as mentioned by Tom
> upthread)?  I would like to think that you mean the former and the
> latter, but this thread mentions only the former.
> --
> Michael




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Intermittent pg_ctl failures on Windows
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SegFault on 9.6.14