Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Daniel Gustafsson
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?
Дата
Msg-id B99278AA-8FA5-4B7A-AF09-F482BDDBDED9@yesql.se
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?  (Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
> On 04 Apr 2017, at 14:58, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
>
> On 4/4/17 8:55 AM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:58 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de
>>
>>    I'm inclined to push this to the next CF, it seems we need a lot more
>>    benchmarking here.
>>
>> No objections.
>
> This submission has been moved to CF 2017-07.

This CF has now started (well, 201709 but that’s what was meant in above), can
we reach closure on this patch in this CF?

cheers ./daniel

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: long transactions on hot standby feedback replica/ proof of concept
Следующее
От: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join