Re: Backpatching injection point core facilities to REL_17_STABLE

> On 27 Jun 2025, at 14:25, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> Thoughts or comments?

I'm +1 on having full-fledged injection points in back branches where possible. Right now I'm debugging a
PG-17(probably)problem where injection preloading would be handy (though functionality is available via hacks, just a
littlemore work). 

But are you going to backpatch all new features of injection points in future? It's potentially x6 more work.

Thanks!


Best regards, Andrey Borodin.