> On 28 Apr 2023, at 06:42, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> If they're that slow, I'd worry more about generating 20GB of xact status
>> data. That's why the tests are disabled by default.
>
> There is exactly zero chance that anyone will accept the introduction
> of such an expensive test into either check-world or the buildfarm
> sequence.
Even though the entire suite is disabled by default, shouldn't it also require
PG_TEST_EXTRA to be consistent with other off-by-default suites like for example
src/test/kerberos?
--
Daniel Gustafsson