> On 30 Nov 2020, at 14:13, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:43:24PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> Since the cryptohash support is now generalized behind an abstraction layer,
>> wouldn't it make sense to roll the resource ownership there as well kind of
>> like how JIT is handled? It would make it easier to implement TLS backend
>> support, and we won't have to inject OpenSSL headers here.
>
> So, you are referring here about using a new API in the abstraction
> layer. This makes sense. What about naming that
> pg_cryptohash_context_free(void *)?
Yeah, that's along the lines of what I was thinking of.
cheers ./daniel