On 12/9/21, 11:34 AM, "John Naylor" <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> When a user must shut down and restart in single-user mode to run
> vacuum on an entire database, that does a lot of work that's
> unnecessary for getting the system online again, even without
> index_cleanup. We had a recent case where a single-user vacuum took
> around 3 days to complete.
>
> Now that we have a concept of a fail-safe vacuum, maybe it would be
> beneficial to skip a vacuum in single-user mode if the fail-safe
> criteria were not met at the beginning of vacuuming a relation. This
> is not without risk, of course, but it should be much faster than
> today and once up and running the admin would have a chance to get a
> handle on things. Thoughts?
Would the --min-xid-age and --no-index-cleanup vacuumdb options help
with this?
Nathan