> 14 сент. 2021 г., в 18:41, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> написал(а):
>
>>> Besides this patch looks good and is ready for committer IMV.
>
> A variant of this patch was originally objected against by Michael, and as this
> version is marked Ready for Committer I would like to hear his opinions on
> whether the new evidence changes anything.
I skimmed the thread for reasoning. --target-restore-command was rejected on the following grounds
> Do we actually need --target-restore-command at all? It seems to me
> that we have all we need with --restore-target-wal, and that's not
> really instinctive to pass down a command via another command..
Currently we know that --restore-target-wal is not enough if postgresql.conf does not reside within PGDATA.
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.