Re: Load balancing of write queries among health-checked nodes
От | me+postgres@kotovalexarian.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Load balancing of write queries among health-checked nodes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B49A2DD9-F3DC-4478-ADCD-834C8435CB9C@kotovalexarian.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Load balancing of write queries among health-checked nodes (Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Among PostgreSQL instances there is only one master. But yes, each server may be considered master by the clients becauseit's Pgpool-II will redirect write queries to the actual master. Maybe it's even better to avoid this unnecessarytraffic between servers and decide which Pgpool-II is in front of the master on the client side, but this is optional. Dnia 8 października 2024 07:30:05 GMT+04:00, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> napisał/a: >On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 11:04 PM <me+postgres@kotovalexarian.com> wrote: > >> Hello. I have a PostgreSQL high availability cluster with Pgpool-II, but I >> don't use the virtual IP feature so my clients don't know which node to >> send queries to. DNS round-robin is not a solution because it can't >> distinguish between healthy and dead nodes. >> >> I thought about having a Pgpool-II instance on each client (client >> Pgpool-II -> cluster Pgpool-II -> PostgreSQL), but AFAIK it can't >> distribute write queries. I also know that libpq may have multiple nodes to >> connect, but I need an advanced health check because a node may have >> connectivity but be separated from the whole cluster so it must be >> considered dead. >> > >Isn't that multi-master clustering? >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: