Re: ideas for auto-processing patches

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Glaesemann
Тема Re: ideas for auto-processing patches
Дата
Msg-id B48866FB-A58D-41DC-9D30-E255D21888AC@seespotcode.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: ideas for auto-processing patches  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>)
Ответы Re: ideas for auto-processing patches  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Jan 8, 2007, at 19:25 , Jim C. Nasby wrote:

> Actually, I see point in both... I'd think you'd want to know if a  
> patch
> worked against the CVS checkout it was written against.

Regardless, it's unlikely that the patch was tested against all of  
the platforms available on the build farm. If it fails on some of the  
build|patch farm animals, or if it fails due to bitrot, the point is  
it fails: whatever version the patch was generated against is pretty  
much moot: the patch needs to be fixed. (And isn't the version number  
included in the patch if generated as a diff anyway?)

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Widen the money type to 64 bits.
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] README for vcbuild