Regarding the eWeek article, Lisa Vaas's included several unfortunate
inaccuracies, even after she updated it with my comments. Most important
for this audience, though, is her implication that EnterpriseDB hasn't
contacted the development team. As many of you know, we have been -- and
are -- working with several community leaders/members to find the right
ways to contribute. Much of that thought process was undercover until a
couple of weeks ago, when we emerged from stealth, but will be much more
public over the next couple of weeks. Stay tuned...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-
> owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Neil Conway
> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:44 PM
> To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
> Subject: [pgsql-advocacy] 2 articles
>
> I didn't see these posted here:
>
> http://www.pervasivepostgres.com/news/04282005.asp
>
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1821359,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03129TX1K000
06
> 08
>
> -Neil
>
> ---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings