-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, February 22, 2008 09:25:33 -0500 Andrew Sullivan
<ajs@crankycanuck.ca> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:26:18PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>
>> Are there any X-Spam headers being added to the messages? Are those
>> messsages scoring low?
>
> Yes and yes. I just got two more (casino ones, in this case) with spam
> scores similar to what others have posted.
>
> I'm wondering whether something simple and rule-based might help catch a lot
> of this before we start Bayes work on them. I mean, "Casino slots" in the
> title is a pretty easy catch :)
We actually have Majordomo setup with a list of 'taboo_subject':
configset DEFAULT taboo_headers <<ENDAAB
/^X-Spam-Status: Yes/ 10,spamassassin
/^X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=([6-9]|\d\d+)/ 20,spamassassin
/^To: .+\@yahoogroups.com/ 1,to_header
/^Subject: Virus/i 1,virus_subject
/^Subject: Virenchecker Information/i 1,virus_subject
/^Subject: Content Violation/i 1,subject
/^Subject: WARNING! Blocked mail/i 1,subject
ENDAAB
so, we can definitely add rules to this, and, in fact, any list owner should be
able to do that for their list (ie. non-english lists) ... if you look in
access_rules, you will see a rule for $taboo_subject, which is defined by tthe
1,subject part of the line ...
So, adding to that list is definitely easy enough ...
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFHv4SE4QvfyHIvDvMRArpsAKCNG4E362XmzPtJf/aoMYm9ORCfvQCgic4Z
5BQf4A4a6NsEL+MjIdswQOo=
=cHWu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----