> On 1 Oct 2024, at 00:43, Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 11:21:30PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> Yeah, I think a view like pg_stat_progress_checksums would work.
>>
>> Added in the attached version. It probably needs some polish (the docs for
>> sure do) but it's at least a start.
>
> Just a nitpick, but we call it data_checksums about everywhere, but the
> new view is called pg_stat_progress_datachecksums - I think
> pg_stat_progress_data_checksums would look better even if it gets quite
> long.
That's a fair point, I'll make sure to switch for the next version of the
patch.
--
Daniel Gustafsson