Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication and Character encoding

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Shinoda, Noriyoshi
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication and Character encoding
Дата
Msg-id AT5PR84MB0084A18D3BF1D93B862E95E4EE4D0@AT5PR84MB0084.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication and Character encoding  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication and Character encoding  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Thank you for creating patches.
I strongly hope that your patch will be merged into the new version.
Since all databases are not yet based on UTF - 8, I think conversion of character codes is still necessary.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI [mailto:horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp]
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 3:31 PM
To: Shinoda, Noriyoshi <noriyoshi.shinoda@hpe.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication and Character encoding

At Wed, 01 Feb 2017 12:13:04 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote in
<20170201.121304.267734380.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> > >  I tried a committed Logical Replication environment. I found
> > > that replication between databases of different encodings did  not
> > > convert encodings in character type columns. Is this  behavior
> > > correct?
> >
> > The output plugin for subscription is pgoutput and it currently
> > doesn't consider encoding but would easiliy be added if desired
> > encoding is informed.
> >
> > The easiest (but somewhat seems fragile) way I can guess is,
> >
> > - Subscriber connects with client_encoding specification and the
> >   output plugin pgoutput decide whether it accepts the encoding
> >   or not. If the subscriber doesn't, pgoutput send data without
> >   conversion.
> >
> > The attached small patch does this and works with the following
> > CREATE SUBSCRIPTION.
>
> Oops. It forgets to care conversion failure. It is amended in the
> attached patch.
>
> > CREATE SUBSCRIPTION sub1 CONNECTION 'host=/tmp port=5432
> > dbname=postgres client_encoding=EUC_JP' PUBLICATION pub1;
> >
> >
> > Also we may have explicit negotiation on, for example,
> > CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT.
> >
> >  'CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT sub1 LOGICAL pgoutput ENCODING EUC_JP'
> >
> > Or output plugin may take options.
> >
> >  'CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT sub1 LOGICAL pgoutput OPTIONS(encoding EUC_JP)'
> >
> >
> > Any opinions?

This patch chokes replication when the publisher finds an inconvertible character in a tuple to be sent. For the case,
dropping-then-recreatingsubscription is necessary to go forward. 

regards,

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion