> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 23:18, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the vote of confidence, on or off list.
> >
> > > too many people spend a lot of
> > > money for proprietary databases, just for some missing features in
> > > PostgreSQL
> >
> > Agreed - PITR isn't aimed at existing users of PostgreSQL. If you use it
> > already, even though it doesn't have it, then you are quite likely to be
> > able to keep going without it.
> >
> > Most commercial users won't touch anything that doesn't have PITR.
>
> Agreed. I am surprised at how few requests we have gotten for PITR. I
> assume people are either using replication or not considering us.
Don't forget that there are (must be) lots of us that know it's coming and
are just waiting until it's available. I haven't requested per se, but
believe me, I'm waiting for it :-)