-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Le 11 oct. 08 à 01:50, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
>> It seems that the real way forward is to improve on that patch.
>
> Yeah. If the schema-per-module answer were really a good answer,
> we'd have done it before now.
I tried to spend some time thinking about those issues and came up
with a packaging management proposal, which I still think has merits.
One of them is to propose to reuse existing stuff and Tom Dunstan's
preliminary work. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-07/msg01098.php
Hope this helps,
- --
dim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkjwmCQACgkQlBXRlnbh1bmIggCdGqD8TwJE7CeZDCL+v5njPtib
4+kAoLVj3rDzsFpJvb/Zc20R+Jo/s5Z7
=O6C6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----