> On 7 Apr 2024, at 18:51, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>> On 7 Apr 2024, at 18:28, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> I'm ok with printing path + some content or just the path.
>
> I think printing the last 512 bytes or so would be a good approach, I'll take
> care of it later tonight. That would be a backpatchable change IMHO.
In the end I opted for just printing the path to avoid introducing logic (at
this point in the cycle) for ensuring that a negative offset doesn't exceed the
filesize. Since it changes behavior I haven't backpatched it, but can do that
if we think it's more of a fix than a change (I think it can be argued either
way, I have no strong feelings).
--
Daniel Gustafsson