Re: new heapcheck contrib module
| От | Mark Dilger |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: new heapcheck contrib module |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | ABBF7CB8-0FCA-4611-962A-1BA17E6621BB@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: new heapcheck contrib module (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Aug 2, 2020, at 8:59 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote: > > What's the point in not just giving up on the index (though not > necessarily the table or other indexes) at the first sign of trouble, > anyway? It makes sense for the heap structure, but not for indexes. The case that came to mind was an index broken by a glibc update with breaking changes to the collation sort order underlyingthe index. If the breaking change has already been live in production for quite some time before a DBA notices,they might want to quantify how broken the index has been for the last however many days, not just drop and recreatethe index. I'm happy to drop that from the patch, though. — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: