Re: Join question
От | Williams, Travis L, NEO |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Join question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AB815D267EC31A4693CC24D234F8291605A36AC0@ACCLUST02EVS1.ugd.att.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Join question ("Williams, Travis L, NEO" <tlw@att.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
about 5% of b are null.. any idea on how to word a query like what I'm looking for? I have no idea in SQL how to use the results of one select in another (I usually just do all of it in perl). Travis -----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey Melloy [mailto:jmelloy@visualdistortion.org] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:44 AM To: Williams, Travis L, NEO Cc: Thomas A. Lowery; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Join question On Friday, August 29, 2003, at 12:36 AM, Williams, Travis L, NEO wrote: > Performace wise would I be better off just doing 2 query's.. i.e. > select > a,b from table1.. then in perl I can check if b is not null and if is > isn't then I do a second query? > > Travis > I would say it depends on the table distribution (% of b that are null, etc). At that point, you're just going to have to experiment, I think, and see what works best for you. My gut says that even including a subselect, it will be faster than checking in perl and issuing another query. But I have no idea, and the proper solution might change drastically based on your data. Jeff
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: